Quantifying the Energy Floor: Direct Measurement and Replay Buffer Bias in SAC-Based HVAC Control on sbsim

We quantify the energy floor -- the minimum achievable cost given action space constraints -- for Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) HVAC control on the sbsim calibrated building simulator. Through minimum-action experiments, we directly measure this floor at USD 35.51/day, dominated by continuous electrical loads (USD 35.44, 99.8%) with negligible gas consumption. The standard SAC baseline, initialized with schedule-policy replay buffer transitions, converges to USD 37.18/day, 4.7% above the floor. We identify buffer initialization as the dominant source of sub-optimality in this scenario: training from an empty buffer reduces cost to USD 35.57/day, eliminating 96% of the gap. Expanding the supply water temperature range by 10 K yields negligible additional savings (USD 0.03/day), and further expansion triggers physical constraint violations. We additionally uncover a discount factor coupling (gamma_eff = 0.891) shrinking the effective planning horizon from 8.3 h to 46 min -- a benchmark-wide issue warranting audit. Systematic ablation across planning horizon, reward weights, and observation enrichment confirms all pre-filled-buffer configurations cluster within 0.7% (USD 37.18--USD 37.42), demonstrating that equipment minimum power -- not algorithmic design -- imposes the binding constraint.

ATLAS: All-round Testing of Long-context Abilities across Scales

Long-context language models now advertise context windows up to millions of tokens, yet evaluations typically report a single length or a narrow task family, masking two failure modes: performance can collapse as length grows, and strong retrieval need not transfer to downstream use. We present ATLAS, a benchmarking framework that redefines long-context evaluation as length-dependent capability profiling. ATLAS contributes three methodological principles:(i) a layered taxonomy separating foundational operations from application workloads so failures can be attributed, (ii) length-aware AUC scoring that integrates score-length curves over a fixed 8K-1M grid, replacing single-point metrics with full degradation profiles, and (iii) ATLAScore, a harmonic-mean aggregate over taxonomy categories that penalizes imbalanced profiles, with end-to-end uncertainty propagation from subset scores through the nonlinear final aggregate. We instantiate the framework across eight capability dimensions with nine auditable components and 6,438 instances, and evaluate 26 models. Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview leads at 128K, Claude-Opus-4.6 leads at 1M. Rankings reshuffle substantially between ATLASscore@8K-128K and ATLASscore@8K-1M: 7 models move by at least two ranks, and the two taxonomy layers share only 61% of cross-model variance, with individual rank gaps up to 12 positions. These results support reporting long-context quality by capability and length, not by a single headline score.

Learning to Adapt SFT Data for Better Reasoning Generalization

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, with post-training playing a crucial role in enhancing their reasoning capabilities. Among post-training paradigms, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely used: it leverages external data to provide dense supervision and enables efficient training. However, directly fine-tuning on expert data can hurt generalization when the data distribution is mismatched with the target model's own distribution. In this work, we propose Data Adaptation for Reasoning Tuning (DART), which formulates the use of a fixed, potentially distributionally misaligned SFT dataset as an optimization problem over demonstration transformations. DART trains a mapper model with reinforcement learning to convert original SFT data into model-adapted supervision that better matches the target model's distribution and learning preferences. The transformed data are then used for SFT, allowing the target model to better exploit external supervision. Experiments across multiple models and datasets show that DART improves generalization, achieves higher training efficiency than direct RL, and helps models surpass standard SFT. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DART525E50D.

OmniISR: A Unified Framework for Centralized and Federated Learning via Intermediate Supervision and Regularization

The global deployment of edge intelligence operates across heterogeneous legal frameworks. While some regions permit centralized learning (CL) via cloud data aggregation, others enforce strict data localization, necessitating federated learning (FL). This operational dichotomy introduces two incompatible optimization regimes (i.e., unbiased global gradients yet coupled with internal covariate shift in CL versus biased, drift-prone local updates in FL), resulting in that any naive integration of the two lacks rigorous theoretical guarantees. To fill this gap, we propose OmniISR, a unified framework that fuses pure CL, pure FL, and hybrid CL-FL training modes via equipping intermediate supervision and regularization (ISR) signals at multiple hidden layers. Specifically, we propose (i) to use mutual-information (MI) as intermediate supervision to align shifting internal covariate in CL and client-drifting representations in FL, and (ii) to adopt negative-entropy (NE) as intermediate regularizer to penalize overconfident prediction, preserve representational uncertainty, and avoid device-specific collapse. On the theory side, we derive (i) a unified, ISR-agnostic, and non-asymptotic O(1/sqrt(T)) convergence bound that shows the introduced ISR does not violate standard SGD convergence, (ii) a federated drift-bound that quantifies the ISR-reduced client drift, (iii) a gradient-alignment guarantee that ensures non-conflicting CL and FL updates under mild bias, and (iv) an explicit escape-time bound that indicates that CL-FL hybrid mixing enlarges effective stochasticity and accelerates escape from strict saddles. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OmniISR consistently improves model performance in both centralized and federated paradigms, reduces the CL-FL gap by 22.60%, and yields 37/48 paired metric wins across multiple FL algorithms.

CineMatte: Background Matting for Virtual Production and Beyond

LED Virtual Production (VP) uses large LED volumes to render backgrounds in real time, enabling in-camera visual effects but making post-shot changes labor-intensive. We address this with CineMatte, a robust background matting framework for VP and beyond. CineMatte employs a cross-attention-conditioned design. Instead of concatenating the background with the input, CineMatte employs a Siamese, frozen DINOv3 Vision Transformer with shared weights to encode the input frame and the captured background separately. A cross-attention module compares the two streams to predict the foreground, preserving pretrained semantics and improving robustness to background shifts. Previous ViT-based matting models use a parallel convolutional "detail branch" to recover fine details, which can cause boundary artifacts in real-world samples due to semantic misalignment with the backbone. We instead replace it with a pretrained, image-guided feature upsampler, which largely mitigates the problem. We also introduce CineMatte-4K, a 4K HDR image-video dataset captured on a professional LED VP stage. To the best of our knowledge, the image subset is the first dataset for VP matting and is non-synthetic, obtained via green-screen insertion; the video subset includes camera motion with tracked trajectories so that arbitrary backgrounds can be rendered later with correct parallax. Across CineMatte-4K and public benchmarks (VideoMatte240K, YouTubeMatte), CineMatte not only excels in VP but also generalizes robustly to real-world footage.

EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective

Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution. However, memory is also essential for agents, as it enables them to store, update, and retrieve information over time. This ability remains under-evaluated, largely because existing benchmarks do not provide a systematic way to assess memory mechanisms. In this paper, we study agent memory from a self-evolving perspective and introduce EvoMemBench, a unified benchmark organized along two axes: memory scope (in-episode vs. cross-episode) and memory content (knowledge-oriented vs. execution-oriented). We compare 15 representative memory methods with strong long-context baselines under a standardized protocol. Results show that current memory systems are still far from a general solution: long-context baselines remain highly competitive, memory helps most when the current context is insufficient or tasks are difficult, and no single memory form works consistently across all settings. Retrieval-based methods remain strong for knowledge-intensive settings, whereas procedural and long-term memory methods are more effective for execution-oriented tasks when their stored experience matches the task structure. We hope EvoMemBench facilitates future research on more effective memory systems for LLM-based agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/DSAIL-Memory/EvoMemBench.

DRL-STAF: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for State-Aware Forecasting of Complex Multivariate Hidden Markov Processes

Forecasting multivariate hidden Markov processes is challenging due to nonlinear and nonstationary observations, latent state transitions, and cross-sequence dependencies. While deep learning methods achieve strong predictive accuracy, they typically lack explicit state modeling, whereas Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) provide interpretable latent states but struggle with complex nonlinear emissions and scalability. To address these limitations, we propose DRL-STAF, a Deep Reinforcement Learning based STate-Aware Forecasting framework that jointly predicts next-step observations and estimates the corresponding hidden states for complex multivariate hidden Markov processes. Specifically, DRL-STAF models complex nonlinear emissions using deep neural networks and estimates discrete hidden states using reinforcement learning, reducing the reliance on predefined transition structures and enabling flexible adaptation to diverse temporal dynamics. In particular, DRL-STAF mitigates the state-space explosion encountered by typical multivariate HMM-based methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DRL-STAF outperforms HMM variants, standalone deep learning models, and existing DL-HMM hybrids in most cases, while also providing reliable hidden-state estimates.

PruneTIR: Inference-Time Tool Call Pruning for Effective yet Efficient Tool-Integrated Reasoning

Tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) enables large language models (LLMs) to enhance their capabilities by interacting with external tools, such as code interpreters (CI). Most recent studies focus on exploring various methods to equip LLMs with the ability to use tools. However, how to further boost the reasoning ability of already tool-capable LLMs at inference time remains underexplored. Improving reasoning at inference time requires no additional training and can help LLMs better leverage tools to solve problems. We observe that, during tool-capable LLM inference, both the number and the proportion of erroneous tool calls are negatively correlated with answer correctness. Moreover, erroneous tool calls are typically resolved successfully within a few subsequent turns. If not, LLMs often struggle to resolve such errors even with many additional turns. Building on the above observations, we propose PruneTIR, a rather effective yet efficient framework that enhances the tool-integrated reasoning at inference time. During LLM inference, PruneTIR prunes trajectories, resamples tool calls, and suspends tool usage through three components: Success-Triggered Pruning, Stuck-Triggered Pruning and Resampling, and Retry-Triggered Tool Suspension. These three components enable PruneTIR to mitigate the negative impact of erroneous tool calls and prevent LLMs from getting stuck in repeated failed resolution attempts, thereby improving overall LLM performance. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of PruneTIR, which significantly improves Pass@1 and efficiency while reducing the working context length for tool-capable LLMs.

UniSonate: A Unified Model for Speech, Music, and Sound Effect Generation with Text Instructions

Generative audio modeling has largely been fragmented into specialized tasks, text-to-speech (TTS), text-to-music (TTM), and text-to-audio (TTA), each operating under heterogeneous control paradigms. Unifying these modalities remains a fundamental challenge due to the intrinsic dissonance between structured semantic representations (speech/music) and unstructured acoustic textures (sound effects). In this paper, we introduce UniSonate, a unified flow-matching framework capable of synthesizing speech, music, and sound effects through a standardized, reference-free natural language instruction interface. To reconcile structural disparities, we propose a novel dynamic token injection mechanism that projects unstructured environmental sounds into a structured temporal latent space, enabling precise duration control within a phoneme-driven Multimodal Diffusion Transformer (MM-DiT). Coupled with a multi-stage curriculum learning strategy, this approach effectively mitigates cross-modal optimization conflicts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniSonate achieves state-of-the-art performance in instruction-based TTS (WER 1.47%) and TTM (SongEval Coherence 3.18), while maintaining competitive fidelity in TTA. Crucially, we observe positive transfer, where joint training on diverse audio data significantly enhances structural coherence and prosodic expressiveness compared to single-task baselines. Audio samples are available at https://qiangchunyu.github.io/UniSonate/.

TriEx: A Game-based Tri-View Framework for Explaining Internal Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs

Explainability for Large Language Model (LLM) agents is especially challenging in interactive, partially observable settings, where decisions depend on evolving beliefs and other agents. We present \textbf{TriEx}, a tri-view explainability framework that instruments sequential decision making with aligned artifacts: (i) structured first-person self-reasoning bound to an action, (ii) explicit second-person belief states about opponents updated over time, and (iii) third-person oracle audits grounded in environment-derived reference signals. This design turns explanations from free-form narratives into evidence-anchored objects that can be compared and checked across time and perspectives. Using imperfect-information strategic games as a controlled testbed, we show that TriEx enables scalable analysis of explanation faithfulness, belief dynamics, and evaluator reliability, revealing systematic mismatches between what agents say, what they believe, and what they do. Our results highlight explainability as an interaction-dependent property and motivate multi-view, evidence-grounded evaluation for LLM agents. Code is available at https://github.com/Einsam1819/TriEx.